A company suspects an employee is leaking sensitive corporate information using encrypted communications over its internal network. A forensic investigator is tasked with both recovering potential encrypted data *and* identifying any attempts to conceal information (e.g., steganography) on the suspect’s computer.
A company investigating an employee for leaking sensitive corporate information using encrypted communications and hidden data requires a meticulous digital forensics approach. The primary goal is to prioritize tools for both recovering encrypted data and detecting steganography on the suspect’s computer system.
The foundational step in any digital forensic investigation is to ensure evidence integrity through proper data acquisition and preservation. This involves creating a forensically sound disk image of the suspect’s computer hard drive using a hardware write-blocker to prevent any alteration to the original digital evidence. Tools like FTK Imager, EnCase Forensic, or X-Ways Forensics are essential for this initial imaging process and for preliminary file system analysis, providing a complete replica of the digital environment. This step is critical before any other analysis begins, preserving the chain of custody.
For encrypted data recovery, the priority shifts to methods that can efficiently access potential encryption keys or bypass encryption. If the suspect computer was running when seized, memory forensics is paramount. Analyzing volatile memory, or RAM, with tools such as the Volatility Framework or Rekall can reveal encryption keys, passphrases, or decrypted fragments of sensitive corporate information that reside in active processes. This can often be the fastest route to decrypting data. If memory analysis is not feasible or successful, dedicated decryption software like Passware Kit Forensic or Elcomsoft Forensic products become crucial for password cracking and brute-force attempts against encrypted volumes, encrypted files, or containers, although these methods can be highly time-consuming. These tools are designed to break various forms of encryption used for data leakage.
Investigating hidden information, or steganography, requires specialized tools to uncover data concealed within seemingly innocuous files. Forensic investigators should employ software capable of performing deep file analysis, looking for statistical anomalies, altered file structures, or unusual metadata within images, audio files, or documents. Tools such as StegDetect, Xsteg, or even advanced features within comprehensive forensic suites that support file carving and signature analysis can help identify covert communications or hidden data steganographically embedded by the employee. These digital forensics tools scrutinize file entropy and compare file headers and footers against known signatures to detect hidden information that indicates an attempt to conceal data.
Ultimately, the digital forensics process involves a holistic use of these tools, correlating findings from encrypted data and hidden information with other digital evidence. This includes timeline reconstruction, keyword searches across all recovered data, and internet activity analysis to fully understand the scope of the data leak and employee misconduct. A skilled forensic investigator leverages a suite of these specialized digital evidence tools to build a comprehensive case, identifying the methods of data leakage and proving the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive corporate information.